Design and Construction

Version 40 (Andrew Starr, 09/13/2012 03:50 am)

1 9 Andrew Starr
h1. Guiding principles of this STM design
2 1 Andrew Starr
3 13 Andrew Starr
* Minimise the effects of external vibrations by minimising size and mass
4 13 Andrew Starr
* Minimise the effects of temperature variation by matching material coefficients of expansion as closely as possible
5 13 Andrew Starr
* Minimise the effects of electronic noise by locating the sensitive circuitry as close as possible to the signal source
6 13 Andrew Starr
* Maximise instrument flexibility and ease of use by doing as much of the signal processing and control as possible in the digital domain
7 13 Andrew Starr
8 13 Andrew Starr
Also
9 13 Andrew Starr
10 13 Andrew Starr
* Use open source tools for all development
11 13 Andrew Starr
* Source all specialised materials and components from readily-available online sources
12 13 Andrew Starr
  
13 9 Andrew Starr
h1. Main building blocks of the STM
14 4 Andrew Starr
15 4 Andrew Starr
h2. High frequency vibration isolator
16 4 Andrew Starr
17 14 Andrew Starr
The STM relies on the precise control of the probe-sample gap. Any external vibration has the potential to disrupt this, so efforts must be made to isolate the instrument. Low-frequency vibration isolation is generally done with large pneumatic or elastomer damping systems. I'm hoping to be able to avoid these by making the instrument as compact and stiff as possible, thereby maximising its resonance frequency (and therefore its response to low frequency vibrations). To isolate from high frequencies, I have chosen the 'stacked plate' approach, as described and characterised in *"Low- and high-frequency vibration isolation for scanning probe microscopy" (A I Oliva, M Aguilar and Victor Sosa in _Measurement Science and Technology_, 9 (1998) 383-390)*
18 14 Andrew Starr
  
19 18 Andrew Starr
The drawings for the isolator stack plates can be found {{dmsff(15,here.)}} The plates are each separated with 3 pieces of 5mm long, 5mm diameter pieces of viton rubber as described in the paper. I used an off-the-shelf viton o-ring from a local supplier and cut pieces off, securing with cyanoacrylate glue:
20 5 Andrew Starr
21 20 Andrew Starr
!Base_disc_with_viton_spacers_ODE.jpg!
22 21 Andrew Starr
23 21 Andrew Starr
The assembled stack:
24 1 Andrew Starr
25 1 Andrew Starr
!Assembled_HF_vibration_isolator_ODE.jpg!
26 24 Andrew Starr
27 24 Andrew Starr
I haven't yet characterised the attenuation of the isolator stack - more on this after I've done some testing.
28 22 Andrew Starr
29 25 Andrew Starr
h2. Piezotube
30 1 Andrew Starr
31 28 Andrew Starr
The piezotube was purchased from EBL Products Inc. The material is EBL2 (PZT-5A). The dimensions and electrode configuration are as below:
32 27 Andrew Starr
33 26 Andrew Starr
!Piezotube_diagram.jpg!
34 25 Andrew Starr
35 38 Andrew Starr
I've used 36AWG telfon-coated wire (R36A705-00 from Hobby King) to connect to the electrodes, secured with epoxy glue. The electrical connection is done with Wire Glue conductive adhesive, as I didn't want to risk depolarising the piezotube by heating it with a soldering iron. The Wire Glue contacts were reinforced with a coating of cyanoacrylate. It's a bit ugly but the connections are very secure:
36 30 Andrew Starr
37 29 Andrew Starr
!Piezotube_with_wires_attached.jpg!
38 29 Andrew Starr
39 25 Andrew Starr
h2. Sample mount
40 25 Andrew Starr
41 25 Andrew Starr
h2. Coarse positioner mechanism
42 25 Andrew Starr
43 37 Andrew Starr
The microscope must have a way of bringing the probe to within tunnelling distance (i.e. nanometres) of the sample without the two crashing into each other. This requires a mechanism that possesses the following properties:
44 37 Andrew Starr
45 37 Andrew Starr
* low mechanical vibration
46 37 Andrew Starr
* low mass 
47 37 Andrew Starr
* nanometer resolution
48 1 Andrew Starr
49 38 Andrew Starr
Two traditional approaches have been stepper motors and 'inchworm'-type piezoelecric devices. Stepper motors are heavy and require lever-reduction systems to achieve the required linear distance resolution. The inchworm devices typically use exotic materials and can be difficult to control.
50 38 Andrew Starr
51 38 Andrew Starr
I have opted to use a Piezo LEGS linear motor from "PiezoMotor.":http://www.piezomotor.se/products/linear/piezo-legs-linear-6n/  This motor weighs only 23g, has nanometer resolution, and PiezoMotor supplies a control module that enables the motor to be controlled via USB. The drive rod is made from alumina, which means it will have a similar coefficient of thermal expansion to the ceramic holder and piezotube.
52 37 Andrew Starr
53 25 Andrew Starr
h2. Probe holder
54 6 Andrew Starr
55 4 Andrew Starr
h2. Piezotube and coarse positioner support
56 6 Andrew Starr
57 4 Andrew Starr
h2. Bias voltage module
58 6 Andrew Starr
59 40 Andrew Starr
!bias_voltage_sketch.jpg!
60 39 Andrew Starr
61 4 Andrew Starr
h2. Tunnelling current amplifier
62 6 Andrew Starr
63 35 Andrew Starr
A transimpedance amplifier is required to convert the tunnelling current to a voltage signal. I have opted to go with a high-bandwidth dual stage design as described in *A low-noise and wide-band ac boosting current-to-voltage amplifier for scanning tunneling microscopy (Dae-Jeong Kim and Ja-Yong Koo, _Review of Scientific Instruments_, 76, 023703 (2005))*. The design in the original paper uses a OPA111 op-amp as the input amplifier, and a OPA2111 dual op-amp for the ac recovery stage. I have opted to use an AD549 in a TO-99 case, as the TO-99 offers the ability to connect the metal case to ground potential, which should assist in screening out external noise. For the dual op-amp I have opted to use an OPA2209, as it is a much better performing device (lower noise, greater gain bandwidth, greater CMRR etc). The design files (in Kicad format) can be found {{dmsff(14,here.)}}
64 35 Andrew Starr
65 36 Andrew Starr
!tca_schematic.jpg!
66 36 Andrew Starr
67 35 Andrew Starr
The amplifier will mount onto the back of the ceramic support, so the signal wire carrying the tunnelling current can be as short as possible.
68 34 Andrew Starr
69 4 Andrew Starr
h2. Control module
70 31 Andrew Starr
71 33 Andrew Starr
[[Lab_Journal]]