Requirements Document v1 0
Version 17 (Jeremy Wright, 05/10/2012 02:49 am)
| 1 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | h1. Requirements Document v1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 3 | 9 | Jeremy Wright | Draft: 2012-05-03 |
| 4 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 5 | 2 | Jeremy Wright | This requirements document is currently being discussed on the forum "here":https://opendesignengine.net/boards/4/topics/72 |
| 6 | 2 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 7 | 4 | Jeremy Wright | Each requirement is labeled with STSR (Shepard Test Stand Requirement), followed by the number of the "initial question":https://opendesignengine.net/projects/shepard-ts/wiki/Initial_Questions_v1_0 that the requirement corresponds to, followed by a dot and then the ID number of the requirement. |
| 8 | 4 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 9 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 1 - Why are we making this? |
| 10 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 11 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 1.1* The STS (Shepard Test Stand) must accommodate low power, commercially available amateur rocket motors sized A through E. |
| 12 | 15 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 1.2* The STS must be mobile enough to enable live demonstrations as part of educational and outreach activities. |
| 13 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 14 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 2 - Who is this for? |
| 15 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 16 | 16 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 2.1* The STS must be well documented so as to meet the needs of open source spaceflight designers who will design and build future test stands (at Mach 30 or elsewhere). |
| 17 | 16 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 2.2* The STS documentation and procedures must be complete enough that Mach 30 operators, students and educators who want to bring rocket engineering into the classroom, and anyone else interested in how rockets are tested can learn how to use it. |
| 18 | 16 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 2.3* The STS documentation must cover the engine testing procedure from test stand setup, to running tests, and ending with stowing the test stand. |
| 19 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 20 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 3 - How will this be used? |
| 21 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 22 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 3.1* The design and operations of the STS shall be conducted in compliance with The National Association of Rocketry (NAR) Standards & Testing Committee Motor Testing Manual, Version 1.5, Effective Date: July 1, 2011, henceforth referred to as the NAR testing manual. |
| 23 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 3.2* Must be useful for the verification of Estes thrust vs time "motor performance data":http://estes.aptinet.com/images/page%2033.pdf . |
| 24 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 3.3* Must be able to record exhaust temperature vs time of Estes motors and transport that data to a laptop computer. |
| 25 | 11 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 3.4* In accordance with (IAW) the safety procedures which are outlined in Section 8 of the "NAR Standards & Testing Committee Motor Testing Manual Version 1.5":http://www.nar.org/SandT/docs/ST-MotorTestingManual.pdf . |
| 26 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 27 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 4 - What features does it need to have (now)? |
| 28 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 29 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.1* The STS shall be easily set up and torn down for demonstration purposes. |
| 30 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.2* The STS shall be easy to package for shipment to any event at which it will be used. |
| 31 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.3* The STS shall provide a stable base on which to test model rocket motors. |
| 32 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.4* The STS shall keep an accurate timestamp for each data point collected during the test. |
| 33 | 13 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.5* In accordance with (IAW) NAR testing manual requirements specified in Section 8.5, the STS shall use a “load cell calibrated with a NIST traceable weight standard”. "1":http://www.nar.org/SandT/docs/ST-MotorTestingManual.pdf |
| 34 | 13 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 4.6* In accordance with (IAW) NAR testing manual requirements specified in Section 8.5, the STS shall use a data collection system “where the least significant bit (LSB) has a value that is” 0.006 lbs (“less than 0.33% percent of the average thrust of the motor under test”). "1":http://www.nar.org/SandT/docs/ST-MotorTestingManual.pdf |
| 35 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 36 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 5 - What features does it need to have (later)? |
| 37 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 38 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | These are for reference only so that future features can be accommodated in the current design where practical. |
| 39 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 40 | 12 | Jeremy Wright | *_Version 2.0:_* |
| 41 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.1* High and low speed video capture of the tests from multiple angles. |
| 42 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.2* Integrated ignition system so the test management software can control the entire test. |
| 43 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.3* Additional measurements. |
| 44 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.4* Higher resolution measurements. |
| 45 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 46 | 12 | Jeremy Wright | *_Beyond Version 2.0 (Accommodation of):_* |
| 47 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.5* High power commercial solid motors. |
| 48 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.6* Small hybrid motors (on the thrust scale of high power commercial solid motors). |
| 49 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.7* Larger thrust hybrid motors. |
| 50 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.8* Small liquid engines. |
| 51 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.9* Medium liquid engines. |
| 52 | 8 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 5.10* Large liquid engines. |
| 53 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 54 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 6 - What are the legacy requirements? |
| 55 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 56 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 6.1* Any desktop computer based control software for the STS should run on all three major PC platforms (MS Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux). |
| 57 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 6.2* The STS must use standard connections to the computer running the control software (for example, USB, Ethernet, or similar connections). |
| 58 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 59 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 7 - Who's going to build this? |
| 60 | 1 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 61 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 7.1* All STS design documentation must be open and complete enough so that ANYONE, without necessarily a technical education in rocketry, propulsion, or engineering, would be able to build and operate a Shepard test stand. |
| 62 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 63 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 8 - How many do we want to make? |
| 64 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 65 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 8.1* The design of the STS must enable the completion of at least one operational test stand. |
| 66 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 8.2* Whenever and wherever possible, considerations should be made so that the design of this STS can be used as a kit in the future. |
| 67 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 68 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 9 - What is the budget? |
| 69 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 70 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 9.1* The cost of the first operational STS must not exceed $200 excluding "consumables" and tools. |
| 71 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 72 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 10 - What is the timeline? |
| 73 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 74 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 10.1* If at all possible, the STS should be completed within 3 months of formal launch as an exercise of agile design. |
| 75 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 76 | 7 | Jeremy Wright | h3. STSR 11 - What waste products will be produced by the manufacture and/or operation of this? |
| 77 | 6 | Jeremy Wright | |
| 78 | 5 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 11.1* Disposal of the spent Estes motors should conform to all local, state, and federal guidelines. |
| 79 | 5 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 11.2* Electronic waste items, including batteries and circuit boards, must also be disposed of according to all local, state, and federal guidelines. |
| 80 | 17 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 11.3* If the frame of the STS is damaged beyond repair during operation, proper disposal/recycling guidelines must be followed for the materials used in its construction. |
| 81 | 5 | Jeremy Wright | *STSR 11.4* Wherever possible, the design should make it as easy as possible to replace components which are consumable or relatively easy to damage. |