Export Control Review
Version 4 (J. Simmons, 05/25/2015 01:10 pm)
| 1 | 1 | J. Simmons | h1. Export Control Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 3 | 1 | J. Simmons | This review uses Mach 30's draft "Export Control Review Process":https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GnT5CLXZBoSRHVLcsWU3-tOUXXcInvZHPFFrOJri3GY/pub. The "Export Control Task Force":http://mach30.org/activites/oshw-community-support/ectf/ (ECTF) is responsible for the shape of and guidance through the review process. The project team is responsible for using the review process. |
| 4 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 5 | 1 | J. Simmons | h3. 1. Define the project and related topics in writing for future reference |
| 6 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 7 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Goals |
| 8 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What is the vision of the project? |
| 9 | 4 | J. Simmons | To facilitate the education of Mach30 volunteers,undergraduate aerospace and high level high school students in Newton's law, fundamental performance characteristics, and fundamental design parameters in a laboratory setting with instructor involvement. Unit will be able to be built with commonly available components and 3D printed parts. |
| 10 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What ultimate purpose does it serve? |
| 11 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## How does it fit into Mach 30’s strategy? |
| 12 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## To what use will the results of the project be put? |
| 13 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Technologies |
| 14 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What is the core technology the project will work on? |
| 15 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What other technologies are necessary to accomplish that work? |
| 16 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What words would an expert use to describe these technologies? |
| 17 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What words would an average person use to describe these technologies? |
| 18 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Inputs and Outputs |
| 19 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What are the project’s major milestones? |
| 20 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What previous projects does this one build off of? |
| 21 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What future projects will build off of this one? |
| 22 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Does this project make use of any specialized, pre-existing knowledge? |
| 23 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Does this project have any measurable or tangible outcomes? |
| 24 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Keywords |
| 25 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What keywords/phrases summarize the previous answers? |
| 26 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## What additional keywords/phrases are relevant? |
| 27 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Put those keywords into a thesaurus; what other relevant keywords appear? |
| 28 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 29 | 1 | J. Simmons | h2. 2. Research the project’s relationship to relevant EC |
| 30 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 31 | 1 | J. Simmons | # USML |
| 32 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Follow the DDTC’s "Order of Review Decision":http://pmddtc.state.gov/licensing/dt_OrderofReview.htm tool |
| 33 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords identified in the previous steps through the text of the "USML":https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/regulations_laws/documents/official_itar/ITAR_Part_121.pdf |
| 34 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords, along with words like “ITAR”, “USML” and “export control” through Google |
| 35 | 1 | J. Simmons | # CCL |
| 36 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords identified in the previous step through the text of the CCL |
| 37 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords, along with words like “EAR”, “CCL” and “export control” through Google |
| 38 | 1 | J. Simmons | # MTCR |
| 39 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords identified in the previous step through the text of the MTCR |
| 40 | 1 | J. Simmons | ## Run all keywords, along with words like “MTCR” and “export control” through Google |
| 41 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 42 | 1 | J. Simmons | h3. 3. Document findings |
| 43 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 44 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Summarize the topic(s) that are explicitly mentioned in EC regulations and/or professional analysis/discussion of EC regulations |
| 45 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Explain any additional concerns |
| 46 | 1 | J. Simmons | # List searches and terms that turned up no relevant results |
| 47 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 48 | 1 | J. Simmons | h3. 4. Triggers |
| 49 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 50 | 1 | J. Simmons | # If possible, define any measurable limits the project cannot cross and an appropriate margin for error |
| 51 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Specify, or guess at, any future dates when relevant information is expected to be become available |
| 52 | 1 | J. Simmons | # Maintain a clear distinction between information used as-is and any changes, additions, derivations, etc added by Mach 30 |
| 53 | 1 | J. Simmons | |
| 54 | 2 | J. Simmons | h3. 5. Reevaluate if a trigger is flipped. |
| 55 | 2 | J. Simmons | |
| 56 | 2 | J. Simmons | Repeat this process if there are any major changes to the project. Update this report at each major milestone. |