back [[Technology_Evaluation]] h1. Structures and Mechanisms Card Storming h2. Unsorted list of ideas * DIGITAL FABRICATION OF COMPONENTS AND MECHANISMS ** could be a problem if it's used to make something that is itself controlled * AN OPEN PLATFORM OF STANDARDS (Like LEGOS) ** vague, but shouldn't be a problem * PAYLOAD MOUNT FOR ARDUINOS ** I have a hard time seeing how this would be a problem; nobody's using an arduino on an actual launch vehicle * UPGRADED ELECTRONICS PAYLOAD STRUCTURES - LIKE FOR FIN-FACING CAMERAS ** payload adapters for launch vehicles are controlled ** "...including the articles identified in section 1516 of Public Law 105–261: satellite fuel, ground support equipment, test equipment, payload adapter or interface hardware..." * FABRICATION IN MAKERSPACES WITH LOCAL TOOLS ** fine as long as nothing needs to be controlled ** or we invent a new way to build an ad-hoc network of people who obey export controls * EXPERIMENT WITH DIFFERENT MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES ** The rules do specify that model/HP rockets need to have a minimum of metal components ** any advanced materials or techniques will inevitably run into USML or CCL rules * SOFTWARE TOOLS - CODECAD AND OPENSOURCECAD (CADQUERY) ** already open source tools will be fine ** we might run into trouble if we create new software for modeling actual launch vehicles * COLLAPSIBLE AND EXPANDABLE MECHANISMS (“ORAGAMI ROCKET”) * THE “BLACK BOX” FOR MODEL ROCKET (CHEAP, DURABLE, RECOVERABLE, LIKE www.carbonorigins.com) * HARDWARE TOOLS AND JIGS * SCALABLE PARTS, AND THE ASSOCIATED STANDARDS FOR USING THEM * SOFTWARE - STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TOOLS (LIKE FEA, NASTRAN, etc.) * (linked to propulsion as well) PROPULSION TEST STAND STRUCTURE * (stretching outside the box a bit) SCALE MODEL OF A SIMULATED LAUNCH COMPLEX. FULL GROUND OPS SIMULATION * (linked in to aerodynamics as well) FIN DESIGN BASED ON J’S MASTERS THESIS (OPTIMIZING SUPERSONIC STRUCTURES TO PREVENT FLUTTER) * STRUCTURAL TESTING (DESTRUCTIVE OR OTHERWISE) * STRUCTURAL DESIGN BEST PRACTICES FOR MANUFACTURING, AND OPERATIONS, (AKA LIFECYCLE CONSIDERATION) * STRUCTURAL INTERACTIONS WITH THE GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT * MATERIALS TESTING FORM AN ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE (UV, THERMAL, (eventually) VACUUM * STRUCTURAL INCORPORATION OF A “MISSION OBJECTIVE” (like rube goldburg, or scientific experiment) * (linked to electrical/power) HOW TO INCORPORATE POWER STORAGE INTO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS * ADDRESSING REUSABILITY CONCERNS WITH RESPECT TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS * HIGH-RELIABILITY RECOVERY SYSTEM (MECHANISMS) * (building on Legos idea) Modular model rocket kit (1 kit, several rockets; maybe based around "NARTREK":http://www.nar.org/model-rocket-info/nartek-skills-program/ missions) * Structural Analysis software for both dynamic and static analysis * Launch Pad design/structures * Go extermely small size (Just how small can I get it?) ** sharing files, etc ** educational/entertainment ** very open source * Evaluation/research of tools and machines required to build rockets at scale we are looking at -> Toolset analysis * Make sure the materials research covers non-obvious choices (to us at least) like composites, etc * Unconventional rockets, like rocket/jet-powered rotors